State v. Machado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing portion of judgment imposing $60 “mandatory state amount” because the court lacked statutory authority to impose it
• portion of judgment imposing $60 “Mandatory State Amt” reversed because the trial court lacked statutory authority to impose it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19· cited 10×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-11· cited 6×
• State v. Vincent
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-01
• State v. Triplett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-07

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DeCamp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-03· cited 60×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-23· cited 33×
• State v. Lewis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 17×
• State v. Beckham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-05· cited 10×
• State v. Lindemann
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-12· cited 8×
• State v. Nutt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-07· cited 5×