Skip to main content

State v. Tison

Citations

  • 424 P.3d 823
  • 292 Or. App. 369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court erred when it imposed monetary obligations in the judgment that exceeded the amount it ordered orally in court and that preservation was not required
  • taking similar approach under former ORS 138.040 (2015), repealed by Or Laws 2017, ch 529, § 26
  • agreeing with the parties that the “trial court erred when it included in the judgments of conviction a monetary penalty that exceeded by $255 the fines announced at the sentencing hearing”
  • remanding for resentencing when record 1 Defendant was acquitted by the jury of one count of delivery of meth- amphetamine. 2 ORS 813.030 provides, in part, that “[t]he fee required by ORS 471.432 and 813.020(1
  • remand for resentencing necessary because there was no record of trial court’s intention regarding dis- cretionary waiver of $255 fee
  • remand for resentencing necessary because there was no record of trial court’s intention regarding dis- cretionary waiver of $255 fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.