Skip to main content

State v. Tippetts

Citations

  • 244 P.3d 891
  • 239 Or. App. 429
  • 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for new evidentiary hear- ing when defendant did not object to the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court and as a result the state did not have an opportunity to present additional evidence in support of restitution
  • we have “consistently remanded for resentenc- ing in circumstances in which the sentencing court erred by imposing restitution in the absence of any evidence of economic damages”
  • we have “consistently remanded for resen- tencing in circumstances in which the sentencing court erred by imposing restitution in the absence of any evidence of economic damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.