Skip to main content

State v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 78 P.3d 1005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • overruling a case because it was incorrect but also briefly noting that it was harmful
  • stating “when offenses harm different victims, the offenses are not factually the same for 19 No. 59502-8-II purposes of double jeopardy”
  • “A citizen reading the guideline statutes will not be forced to guess at the potential consequences that might befall one who engages in prohibited conduct because the guidelines do not set penalties.”
  • “A citizen reading the guideline statutes will not be forced to guess at the potential consequences that might befall one who engages in prohibited conduct because the guidelines do not set penalties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Baldwin

174 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.