State v. Baldwin
Citations
- 15 Wash. 15
- 45 P. 650
- 1896 Wash. LEXIS 127
- 1896 WL 251
Syllabus
<p>HOMICIDE — SUFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION — PLACE OF DEATH — DYING DECLARATIONS —COMPETENCY — PAROL EVIDENCE OF MEMORANDA — INSTRUCTIONS.</p> <p>Under Laws 1891, p. 47, § 4, providing for the trial of all criminal actions in the county where the offence was committed, it is not necessary, in an information charging the commission of murder in a certain county, to also allege the place of death of the deceased, in order to give jurisdiction to the court of the county where the of-fence was committed.</p> <p>Where an information charges the commission of murder in a certain county, but fails to allege where the deceased died as a result of the assault upon him, the introduction of proof showing death in the county in which the assault was made is harmless error.</p> <p>The constitutional provision declaring that the accused shall have the right to meet the witnesses against him face to face, will not exclude evidence of dying declarations.</p> <p>Proof of conviction of an infamous crime may be given to affect the credibility of one making dying declarations, but cannot be urged as a ground for their exclusion.</p> <p>The fact that, for some days after deceased had been shot, he had-no fear of impending death, is not ground for excluding his dying declarations, when it appears that at the time they were made, his condition had grown more serious, and he had been told by the doctor he was about to die, and had said that he.realized it.</p> <p>Where a dying declaration has been made to an attorney, who afterwards, not in the presence of the deceased, reduced it to writing, but not always in the language of the deceased, even including incorrect statements in one or two minor matters, and the declaration is subsequently read to the deceased and signed by him, it is still admissible in evidence, as a question for the jury to pass upon.</p> <p>The fact that notice had been served upon the state to produce a certain memorandum book at the trial of a .criminal prosecution, whi
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admission of dying declaration in murder trial did not violate defendant's right to confront witnesses face to face as it was the practice to admit such statements in this state \up to the present time\
- admission of dying declaration in murder trial did not violate defendant’s right to confront witnesses face to face as it was the practice to admit such statements in this state “up to the present time”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 113×
- State of Washington v. Dennis Wayne JussilaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-02-28· cited 34×
- State v. MayoWashington Supreme Court· 1906-04-13· cited 32×
- People v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court· 1972-05-04· cited 22×
- State v. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-13· cited 17×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 10×
- State v. MontesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-06-01· cited 4×
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1914-07-22· cited 3×
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-03-13· cited 2×
- People v. PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1924-06-03
- Pueblo v. PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1924-06-03
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.