Skip to main content

State v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 84

Syllabus

Trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence that defendant's brother threatened witness where defendant was not shown to have been involved in those threats and threats were not offered for proper purpose such as to explain why a witness's story changed or why a witness did not immediately come forward to police. Reversal was required because state failed to show that admission of improper evidence did not affect defendant's substantial rights.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.