Skip to main content

State v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 629 P.2d 222
  • 192 Mont. 521
  • 1981 Mont. LEXIS 741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sentencing judge did not err when he relied on pre-sentence report which contained defendant's volunteered version of the underlying facts of his previous acquittal
  • sentencing judge did not err when he relied on pre-sentence report which contained defendant’s volunteered version of the underlying facts of his previous acquittal
  • finding “no assurance” in the record that trial court did not impose a harsher sentence “in retaliation for defendant’s insistence on a trial by jury”
  • adopting ABA Standards for Criminal Justice No. 14-1.8(b) (Am. Bar Ass’n 2d ed. 1980) and remanding case because “[w]e have no assurance that the trial court did not increase the sentence in retaliation for defendant’s insistence on a trial by jury”
  • “To punish a person for exercising a constitutional right is a basic due process violation.”
  • “a sentencing court which becomes involved in the plea bargaining process, and which imposes a harsher sentence after trial than was offered in exchange for a guilty plea, must specifically point out factors that justify the increased sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison, Morrison, Shea, Sheehy, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.