· 1/3/1990
United States v. Alan Reed Wivell
Citations
- 893 F.2d 156
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 67
- 1990 WL 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he limitations the Guidelines place on a judge’s discretion cannot violate a defendant’s right to due process by reason of being vague.”
- “[Bjoth theories supporting the vagueness doctrine presume a law that attempts to proscribe or prescribe conduct.”
- “[B]oth theories supporting the vagueness doctrine presume a law that attempts to proscribe or prescribe conduct.”
- “[T]he limitations the Guidelines place on a judge’s discretion cannot violate a defendant’s right to due process by reason of being vague.”
- reduction denied because of continued drug activity after indictment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Lay, Magill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.