State v. Stubbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to allow for our meaningful review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stubbs
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 75×
• Burbank Irrigation District 4 v. Dep't Of Ecology
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-17

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Tuilaepa v. California
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 983×
• State v. Camarillo
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-07-26· cited 730×
• State v. Weber
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 328×
• State v. Nordby
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 272×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 272×
• State v. Elmore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 182×
• State v. Ritchie
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-05-11· cited 160×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 151×
• State v. Baldwin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-11-06· cited 111×
• State v. Jeannotte
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 65×
• State v. Worrell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-09-08· cited 55×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-02· cited 55×
• Weber v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-18· cited 35×
• State v. Hammond
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-07-08· cited 31×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-24· cited 29×
• State v. Bourgeois
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-24· cited 24×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-30· cited 19×
• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-12-04· cited 14×