State v. Rider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Both this court and the Supreme Court have repeatedly held that, when an officer retains a person’s identification for investigatory purposes during questioning, the person is restrained from leaving.”
• \Defendant was sweating profusely and was obviously nervous.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Highley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-26· cited 29×
• State v. Ayles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 16×
• State v. Lay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-06· cited 12×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 12×
• State v. Broughton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 10×
• State v. Hemenway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-09· cited 7×
• State v. Chambers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 7×
• State v. Astorga
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-31· cited 6×
• State v. Strader
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-19· cited 4×
• State v. Cohan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 3×
• State v. Maxie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-21· cited 1×
• State v. Moser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-01· cited 1×
• State v. Norton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-22· cited 1×
• State v. Maciel-Figueroa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 1×
• State v. Beets
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15
• State v. Highley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-07-23