Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/14/1987
Ross v. State
Citations
- 519 A.2d 735
- 308 Md. 337
- 1987 Md. LEXIS 169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \the short form indictment specified by [Crim. Law] § 616 to charge all forms of murder adequately protects a defendant's constitutional right of fair notice and due process\ (emphasis added)
- holding that “the short form indictment specified by [Crim. Law] § 616 to charge all forms of murder adequately protects a defendant’s constitutional right of fair notice and due process” (emphasis added)
- the charging document did not have to inform the accused of the specific theory on which the State would rely
- “[A] conviction of first degree murder may be proved ... by showing a homicide committed in the perpetration, or attempted perpetration, of one of the enumerated felonies (felony murder).” (Emphasis added)
- “[A] conviction of first degree murder may be proved either by showing deliberation, wilfulness and premeditation (premeditated murder), or by showing a homicide committed in the perpetration, or attempted perpetration, of one of the enumerated felonies (felony murder
- “[A] conviction of first degree murder may be proved either by showing deliberation, wilfulness and premeditation (premeditated murder), or by showing a homicide committed in the perpetration, or attempted perpetration, of one of the enumerated felonies (felony murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-14· cited 337×
- Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-13· cited 124×
- Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 96×
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-04· cited 92×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-27· cited 77×
- State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-10· cited 74×
- Dishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-21· cited 68×
- Richmond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 63×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-04· cited 56×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-28· cited 47×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-07· cited 46×
- State v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-06· cited 40×
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-20· cited 38×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-06· cited 36×
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court· 1988-07-19· cited 35×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-07· cited 32×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-08-03· cited 31×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-06· cited 28×
- United States v. Juan Ortiz-OrellanaFourth Circuit· 2024-01-10· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.