Skip to main content
· 6/18/1990

State v. Litteral

Citations

  • 793 P.2d 268
  • 110 N.M. 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[ejvidence inadmissible for one.purpose may be admissible for other purposes under a different rule of evidence”
  • “Evidence inadmissible for one purpose may be admissible for other purposes under a different rule of evidence.”
  • “Evidence inadmissible for one purpose may be 9 admissible for other purposes under a different rule of evidence.”
  • evidence of drugs and drug paraphernalia relevant to establish motive
  • impeachment of witness, even if improper, not prejudicial error
  • evidence of drug paraphernalia relevant to establish motive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Ransom, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.