· 6/18/1990
State v. Litteral
Citations
- 793 P.2d 268
- 110 N.M. 138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[ejvidence inadmissible for one.purpose may be admissible for other purposes under a different rule of evidence”
- “Evidence inadmissible for one purpose may be admissible for other purposes under a different rule of evidence.”
- “Evidence inadmissible for one purpose may be 9 admissible for other purposes under a different rule of evidence.”
- evidence of drugs and drug paraphernalia relevant to establish motive
- impeachment of witness, even if improper, not prejudicial error
- evidence of drug paraphernalia relevant to establish motive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sosa, Ransom, Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.