Kirk Co. v. Ashcraft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sales manager was a “qualified 9 witness” to lay a foundation under the business records exception even though he 10 lacked personal knowledge of the accuracy
• stating that there was no need for trial court to instruct the jury on a notice requirement when it was not at issue
• interpreting “qualified witness” under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6), which is identical to SCRA 11 — 803(F
• interpreting “qualified witness” under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6), which is identical to SCRA 11 — 803(F)
• finding reversible error because defendant was entitled to have the jury \fully informed on the law\
• finding reversible error because defendant was entitled to have the jury “fully informed on the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).