Oregon Supreme Court· 8/2/2018

State v. Anderson

Citations

423 P.3d 43
363 Or. 392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial court engaged in OEC 403 balancing even though it did not expressly discuss its analysis
concluding that, “[i]n context, the trial court’s statement is sufficient for us to conclude that it balanced the probative value of the [evidence] against the danger of unfair prejudice”
concluding that, “[i]n context, the trial court’s statement is sufficient for us to conclude that it balanced the probative value of the [evidence] against the danger of unfair prejudice”
holding that a trial court makes a sufficient record to support a discretionary ruling when the ruling, considered in light of the parties’ arguments, demon- strates that the court evaluated the appropriate consider- ations
inferring that the trial court engaged in OEC 403 balanc- ing even though it did not expressly discuss the concepts implicit in that analysis
affirming trial court’s OEC 403 ruling because “we could determine from the record that the trial court had considered and weighed [the OEC 403] factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.