Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/2/2019

State v. Gibson

Citations

299 Or. App. 582
451 P.3d 259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“In evaluating a trial court’s discretionary ruling under OEC 403, our role is to assess whether the court’s decision falls within the range of legally permissible choices.”
“In evaluating a trial court’s discretionary ruling under OEC 403, our role is to assess whether the court’s decision falls within the range of legally permissible choices.”
“[T]he trial court also would have acted within its discretion had it reached a contrary conclusion about its admissibility, but, on this record, that was not the only permissible legal outcome available to the court.”
“[T]he trial court also would have acted within its discretion had it reached a con- trary conclusion about its admissibility, but, on this record, that was not the only permissible legal outcome available to the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lagesen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.