Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/14/2021

State v. Altabef

Citations

313 Or. App. 240
493 P.3d 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[T]he record sufficiently demon- strates that the trial court balanced that probative value against any possible prejudice to defendant and determined that the probative value outweighed any such prejudice.”
“[I]t was within the legally permissible range of outcomes for the trial court to 5 We recognize that “regardless of whether evidence is offered to show a defendant’s ‘sexual purpose’ in committing the charged offense, that evidence is inadmissible under OEC 404(3
“We review a trial court’s balanc- ing under OEC 403 for an abuse of discretion and generally defer to the trial court’s decision whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the potential for prejudice.” (Brackets and internal quotation marks omit- ted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeVore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.