MacY v. Blatchford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disagreeing that trial court made OEC 403 ruling when court did not do so expressly, although it labeled evidence as “highly inflammatory” and “prejudicial”
• noting that the trial court's OEC 403 ruling had applied the wrong legal standard and holding that, under the correct standard, the evidence was admissible
• disagreeing that trial court made OEC 403 ruling when court did not do so expressly, although it labeled evidence as “highly inflammatory” and “prejudicial”
• “An explanation clarifies an issue or makes it understandable to the recipient * * (Emphasis added.)
• \An explanation clarifies an issue or makes it understandable to the recipient * * *.\ (Emphasis added.)
• reversible error to exclude evidence of sexual relationship between plaintiff and her physician as evidence was held relevant to her claim of negligence and informed consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).