Skip to main content

State v. Evans

Citations

  • 671 N.W.2d 720
  • 2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 206
  • 2003 WL 22671551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court could not presume prejudice from pretrial publicity where voir dire was not reported because there was “no way of knowing the impact of publicity on the jurors”
  • stating that “[b]efore we will reverse an order denying a motion to change venue, the defendant must show” actual prejudice or presumed prejudice
  • finding purposeful personal contact where defendant went to the victim’s house uninvited on three separate occasions after the victim had repeatedly rebuffed defendant’s contact
  • finding purposeful personal contact where the defendant went to the victim’s house uninvited after being rebuffed repeatedly by the victim
  • finding sufficient evidence to support a stalking conviction even though the defendant never made any threats based on his persistent contact with the victim and unexpected arrivals at her house
  • considering “prior history between the two parties” when examining intent for harassment conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.