State v. Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact of the rape charge would be relevant in a separate trial on the witness tampering to show why the tampering occurred.”
• “[T]he fact of the rape charge would be relevant in a separate trial on the witness tampering to show why the tampering occurred.”
• the defendant paid and arranged for a key complaining witness to be out-of-state during trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chenoweth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-22· cited 43×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2001-11-15· cited 40×
• State v. Nordlund
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-30· cited 26×
• State v. Buss
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-02-06· cited 22×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-08-23· cited 21×
• State v. Modest
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-07· cited 17×
• State v. Forsythe
  Montana Supreme Court· 2017-03-14· cited 8×
• State v. Denton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-30· cited 5×
• State v. Wiley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-28· cited 1×
• State v. Victoria
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-11
• State Of Washington v. Chad Chenoweth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-22
• State Of Washington v. Carlos Alberto Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-01-16
• State Of Washington, V. Jerry George Wood, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-11-08
• State v. William Hill
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2024-01-18