Skip to main content

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 309 S.W.3d 512
  • 2009 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 645
  • 2009 WL 2433101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that information contained in a previous wiretap application and properly incorporated into a subsequent wiretap application “retains its relevance and applicability due to the Defendant’s suspected membership in [the same] drug-trafficking organization”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David H. Welles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.