United States v. Narciso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wording of rule “mandate[s] the broadest inquiry into the nature of the challenged proceeding”
• statement of patient he “was shot” admissible but statement “shot by white man” not admissible
• statement of patient he \was shot\ admissible but statement \shot by white man\ not admissible
• identification of suspect after hypnosis should not be excluded because it did not create a substantial likelihood of misidentification
• statement of patient he was shot admissible but statement shot by white man not
• statement of adult patient identifying drug supplier inadmissible where it was not clear physician communicated to patient he needed to know patient’s supplier to find out what medication was given, and not for accusatory purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).