Supreme Court of Florida· 7/3/2002

Hall v. State

Citations

823 So. 2d 757
2002 WL 1430598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “a statutory criminal sentencing scheme, such as the [Criminal Punishment] Code, is substantive in nature because it is a product of legislative policy” and therefore within the province of the Legislature
stating that an argument not made in the initial brief is “procedurally barred”
finding where the appellant “made no argument” as to a certain issue in his initial brief, that issue was deemed abandoned
finding procedurally barred argument made in appellant’s reply brief that was not raised in the initial brief
finding procedurally barred argument made in appellant's reply brief that was not raised in the initial brief
noting an argument may not be raised for the first time in a reply brief: “[i]n fact, a party abandons any issue that was not raised in the initial petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.