United States v. David Carrera and Luis M. Carrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while the district judge did not make specific findings as to a perjury charge, it was sufficient for the judge to have made findings which “did encompass falsity, willfulness, and materiality”
• holding that No. 02-1262 7 while the district judge did not make specific findings as to a perjury charge, it was sufficient for the judge to have made findings which “did encompass falsity, willfulness, and materiality”
• finding that the “lack of trustworthiness in [Carrera’s] admissions, his limited admissions, and his changing admissions” was “an appropriate independent justification for denying the reduction.”
• finding that the “lack of trustworthiness in [Carrera’s] admissions, his limited admissions, and his changing admissions” was “an appropriate independent justification for denying the reduction.”
• holding under Apprendi that to convict a defendant of violating § 846 the jury need not find that the defendant had knowledge of the drug quantity and type
• holding under Apprendi that to convict a defendant of violating § 846 the jury need not find that the defendant had knowledge of the drug quantity and type

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).