Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 614 N.E.2d 649
  • 415 Mass. 447
  • 1993 Mass. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s actual knowledge of the quantity of cocaine not required for conviction of trafficking
  • rejecting defendant’s argument that police should have reappraised circumstances at threshold and determined that there was no need not to announce themselves
  • rejecting defendant’s unpreserved argument that she was entitled to jury instruction requiring Commonwealth to prove that she had actual knowledge that amount of cocaine involved exceeded statutory amount
  • rejecting defendant’s unpreserved argument that she was entitled to jury instruction requiring Commonwealth to prove that she had actual knowledge that amount of cocaine involved exceeded statutory amount
  • in convicting defendant of trafficking instead of possession, Commonwealth need prove only quantity of drugs, not defendant's knowledge of quantity
  • “Proof that the defendant knew the exact nature of the controlled substance is not an element of the crime [of trafficking].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucos, Abrams, Nolan, O'Connor, Greaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.