Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 6/8/1993
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 614 N.E.2d 649
- 415 Mass. 447
- 1993 Mass. LEXIS 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s actual knowledge of the quantity of cocaine not required for conviction of trafficking
- rejecting defendant’s argument that police should have reappraised circumstances at threshold and determined that there was no need not to announce themselves
- rejecting defendant’s unpreserved argument that she was entitled to jury instruction requiring Commonwealth to prove that she had actual knowledge that amount of cocaine involved exceeded statutory amount
- rejecting defendant’s unpreserved argument that she was entitled to jury instruction requiring Commonwealth to prove that she had actual knowledge that amount of cocaine involved exceeded statutory amount
- in convicting defendant of trafficking instead of possession, Commonwealth need prove only quantity of drugs, not defendant's knowledge of quantity
- “Proof that the defendant knew the exact nature of the controlled substance is not an element of the crime [of trafficking].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucos, Abrams, Nolan, O'Connor, Greaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-12-12· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-07-17· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-04-02· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-03-22· cited 43×
- Swaby v. YatesFirst Circuit· 2017-01-30· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-05-22· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. SweezeyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-09-08· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. MaciasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-14· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. Va Meng JoeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-05-31· cited 18×
- State v. Nunez-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-27· cited 17×
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-12-15· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. GarnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-11-08· cited 16×
- State v. StefaniIdaho Court of Appeals· 2005-12-21· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. FriasMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-07-15· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. RicheMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-02-07· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-04-20· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-07-02· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. DePalmaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-12-17· cited 10×
- Ex Parte WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2001-10-12· cited 8×
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-19· cited 7×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. CundriffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-12-16· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. ScaliseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-09-15· cited 69×
- United States v. Juan Octavio Pena GonzalezFifth Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-20· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. Pares-RamirezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-08-11· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-07-12· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. SabettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-02-04· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. MaracicMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-10-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.