Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/12/1992

State v. Alexander

Citations

822 P.2d 1250
64 Wash. App. 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding 28 No. 48560-5-II this narrow exception allows only evidence establishing that a complaint was timely made
\An expert's opinion as to the defendant's guilt invades the jury's exclusive function to weigh the evidence and determine credibility.\
by stating his belief that child was not lying about sexual abuse, expert \effectively testified\ that defendant was guilty as charged
by stating his belief that the child was not lying about sexual abuse, the expert \effectively testified\ that the defendant was guilty as charged
reversal required because (1) a witness impermissibly suggested the victim's story was consistent and truthful, (2) the prosecutor impermissibly elicited the defendant's identity from the victim's mother, and (3
reversal required because (1) a witness impermissibly suggested the victim's story was consistent and truthful, (2) the prosecutor impermissibly elicited the defendant's identity from the victim's mother, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.