Skip to main content

State v. Chenoweth

Citations

  • 188 Wash. App. 521
  • 354 P.3d 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining, “this [Davis] holding has not been overruled, and no statute requires corroboration in incest cases”
  • allowing police officer to generically describe accusations of sexual abuse to explain the officer’s investigation
  • testimony that victim reported the allegation was admissible to show what investigating officers did next and to provide a basis for their testimony
  • victim’s out-of-court statements to witnesses were not offered for the truth of the allegations but rather to “explain how the allegations came to the attention of law enforcement”
  • disclosure nearly a year after assault was not reasonably timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Cox, Verellen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.