State v. Carlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the admission of taped interviews containing police statements challenging the defendant’s veracity may also violate the defendant’s right to due process
• concluding “in a nonjury trial a witness’ opinion as to the defendant’s guilt violates the defendant’s jury trial right by invading the province of the impartial fact finder”
• the police officer testified that the tracking dog followed the defendant’s “ ‘fresh guilt scent’ ”
• the police officer testified that the tracking dog followed the defendant's \fresh guilt scent\
• police officer testified that tracking dog followed defendant's \fresh guilt scent\
• testimony \arguably\ was an improper opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).