State v. Heggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the United States Supreme Court has \never embraced the theory that a defendant's ignorance of the full consequences of his decisions vitiates their voluntariness\ when assessing the voluntariness of custodial statements (internal quotation marks omitted
• stating that the United States Supreme Court has “never ‘embraced the theory that a defendant’s ignorance of the full consequences of his decisions vitiates their voluntariness’ ” when assessing the voluntariness of custodial statements (internal quotation marks omitted
• admitting “findings that the bullet had 20 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. In the Matter of the Welfare of M.R., No. 100144-4 traveled at an angle . . . and had passed through a number of vital organs, causing [the victim’s] death”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).