Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/10/2006

State v. Warren

Citations

134 Wash. App. 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that isolated comments are not likely to affect verdict
inmates' freedom of association may be restricted to the extent reasonably necessary to accomplish the essential needs of the State and public order
inmates’ freedom of association may be restricted to the extent reasonably necessary to accomplish the essential needs of the State and public order
“No witness may state an opinion about a victim’s credibility because such testimony ‘invades the province of the jury to weigh the evidence and decide the credibility of [the witness].’ ” (alteration in original
“the prosecutor argued that [the witness]’s testimony was credible based on specific details she testified to at trial” and thus “[b]ecause the prosecutor’s argument was based on the evidence presented at trial, it was not misconduct.”
admission of prior convictions otherwise excluded by ER 609

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid, Coleman, Schindler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.