New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/30/1993
State v. Alberico
Citations
- 861 P.2d 192
- 116 N.M. 196
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the abuse of discretion standard does not prevent an appellate court from conducting a meaningful analysis
- recognizing that a jury does not have to accept an expert’s opinion as conclusive even though opinion may be uneontroverted
- recognizing that “an 10 expert’s opinion is not conclusive of a fact in issue even though the opinion may be 11 uncontroverted
- recognizing that “an 7 expert’s opinion is not conclusive of a fact in issue even though the opinion may be 8 uncontroverted
- holding that an expert may 16 not testify that the victim’s symptoms “were in fact caused by sexual abuse”
- holding that an expert may 5 not testify that the victim’s symptoms “were in fact caused by sexual abuse”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
143 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of Ernesto M., Jr.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-02-01· cited 348×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-30· cited 272×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-02-15· cited 266×
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2003-02-24· cited 250×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-28· cited 174×
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-10-06· cited 171×
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-12-18· cited 151×
- State v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-01-20· cited 139×
- State v. SamoraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2016-08-08· cited 139×
- State v. Dylan J.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-02-03· cited 133×
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-05· cited 132×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-05-16· cited 123×
- State v. NietoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-10-16· cited 123×
- State v. LaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 115×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2016-02-15· cited 115×
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-04-14· cited 113×
- State v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court· 2009-01-28· cited 106×
- State v. DowneyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-10-16· cited 103×
Cites
78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- United States v. John W. DowningThird Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 627×
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-30· cited 297×
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 291×
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 265×
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 202×
- State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 192×
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 189×
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-06-05· cited 182×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-01-17· cited 170×
- Russell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1984-02-27· cited 169×
- State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 152×
- Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 145×
- State v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-07-16· cited 117×
- Townsend v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1987-05-13· cited 111×
- State v. ChouinardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 111×
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 108×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.