Skip to main content

Townsend v. State

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 705
  • 103 Nev. 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is improper to directly characterize alleged victim's testimony as either truthful or false
  • holding that it is improper to directly characterize alleged victim’s testimony as either truthful or false
  • recognizing that expert testimony may have a corroborative effect on the complaining witness’s testimony
  • recognizing that expert testimony may have a corroborative effect on the complaining witness's testimony
  • noting that expert opinion that invaded the jury's province, such as testimony concerning the victim's credibility and weighing of the evidence, was improper, although harmless error under the circumstances of the case
  • noting that an expert may give an opinion on issues that embrace the ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact so long as it is within scope of expertise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Townsend v. State

204 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.