Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order to find a confusing jury charge harmless, \we must determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict.\
• holding a jury charge which is substantially correct and covers the law does not require reversal
• holding a plaintiff's on the record explanation of his objection to a jury charge along with the court's ruling on that issue was sufficient to preserve the objection
• stating a jury charge is correct if, when read as a whole, it contains the correct definition and adequately covers the law
• finding a jury charge should be reviewed as a whole, and if the charges are reasonably free from error, isolated portions that might be misleading do not constitute reversible error
• a jury charge is correct if, when the charge is read as a whole, it contains the correct definition and adequately covers the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).