Starling v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that notice of the trial and pretrial conference dates sent to defense counsel after the information was filed constituted “other process” to commence prosecution
• noting that if the 1997 version of section 775.15(5) had been applicable, the defendant's prosecution would have commenced upon the filing of the information because he had been first arrested on the charge
• notice of pretrial conference and trial dates to defense counsel after information filed was sufficient \other process\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Parks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-20· cited 5×
• State v. Ramos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-12· cited 2×
• McLaughlin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-31· cited 1×
• Brydger v. Wolfe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-11· cited 1×
• Corker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rubin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-10· cited 49×
• State v. Grooms
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-17· cited 13×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-21· cited 8×
• State v. Martinez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-06· cited 7×
• State v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-31· cited 7×
• Mercer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-05· cited 4×