Skip to main content

Starling v. State

Citations

  • 152 So. 3d 868
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20808
  • 2014 WL 7274508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing conviction for robbery with a weapon based on truly inconsistent verdict finding that appellant did not possess firearm during commission of robbery
  • “[T]he only weapon referenced in the record as being involved in the crime was the firearm allegedly wielded by Appellant, which the jury affirmatively concluded Appellant did not possess.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Osterhaus, Rowe, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.