Skip to main content

Starling v. State

Citations

  • 903 A.2d 758
  • 2006 Del. LEXIS 407
  • 2006 WL 2069411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Starling does not claim that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s findings that the three statutory aggravators were each proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • previous convictions for reckless endangering and robbery
  • previous convictions for reckless endangering and robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.