District of Columbia· 1/15/2016
Stankevich v. Kaplan
Citations
- 156 F. Supp. 3d 86
- 2016 WL 206293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to impose monetary sanctions on pro se litigant who brought frivolous claim because the complaint was litigant’s first before the court and he had filed fewer than ten complaints relating to the same alleged harm
- “Courts around the country have generally refrained from sanctioning pro se plaintiffs under Rule 11 unless the plaintiff has filed multiple frivolous and overlapping claims.”
- \The Court may dismiss a complaint sua sponte pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) where it is 'patently obvious' that the plaintiff cannot prevail on the facts alleged in the complaint.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Braun v. United States Post OfficeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-27
- Canuto v. CarterDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-30
- Hall v. NielsenDistrict of Columbia· 2018-11-08
- Sweigert v. PodestaDistrict of Columbia· 2019-03-18
- Pincus Hueter v. KruseDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-18
- Hooli v. CombsDistrict of Columbia· 2024-11-20
- Central American Bank for Economic Integration v. MossiDistrict of Columbia· 2025-09-25
- Klayman v. PorterDistrict of Columbia· 2026-02-06
- Park v. BrehmbhattDistrict of Columbia· 2026-03-03
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court· 1998-05-04· cited 2,583×
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,362×
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 490×
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 485×
- Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1990-10-09· cited 315×
- Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwaySecond Circuit· 1998-02-25· cited 260×
- National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of EducationD.C. Circuit· 2004-05-14· cited 256×
- Andre L. Phillips v. Richard P. Seiter, Glenn Watson v. Jeffrey J. ClarkSeventh Circuit· 1999-04-12· cited 228×
- In Re Interbank Funding Corp. SEC. LitigationD.C. Circuit· 2010-12-28· cited 218×
- United States v. Antone R. White, A/K/A ToneD.C. Circuit· 1997-06-27· cited 158×
- James H. Ricketts, Sr. v. Midwest National Bank, James H. Ricketts, Sr. v. Sharp Investment CompanySeventh Circuit· 1989-05-11· cited 151×
- Gonzalez v. HastySecond Circuit· 2011-06-22· cited 146×
- United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherD.C. Circuit· 1988-03-08· cited 137×
- In Re Thomas D. Powell, in Re Brian BrownD.C. Circuit· 1988-07-15· cited 120×
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-26· cited 103×
- Edmondson & Gallagher v. Alban Towers Tenants Ass'nD.C. Circuit· 1995-03-10· cited 90×
- Urban v. United NationsD.C. Circuit· 1985-08-02· cited 83×
Other cases named Stankevich v. Kaplan
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.