Skip to main content
· 2/25/1998

Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. Conway

Citations

  • 138 F.3d 65
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 1965(b) confers nationwide service 2 The Fifth Circuit, in applying the limitations of section 1965(a
  • finding that in order to grant dismissal for forum non conveniens, court must satisfy itself that litigation may be conducted elsewhere against all defendants
  • noting that adequacy of alternate forum \does not depend on the existence of the identical cause of action\
  • noting that adequacy of alternate forum “does not depend on the existence of the identical cause of action”
  • noting completion of a jury trial in an ATCA case addressing extrajudicial killing in Nigeria
  • stating without holding that Sixth Circuit precedent in the non-RICO context \supports acceptance of the national contacts approach\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Leval, Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.