· 5/11/1989
James H. Ricketts, Sr. v. Midwest National Bank, James H. Ricketts, Sr. v. Sharp Investment Company
Citations
- 874 F.2d 1177
- 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1161
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6971
- 1989 WL 51335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where a sua sponte dismissal is contemplated by a district court, that court must first give “both notice of the court’s intention and an opportunity to respond”
- allegations must have minimum plausibility to support jurisdiction, or risk dismissal under the substantiality doctrine
- because a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over an obviously frivolous complaint, dismissal prior to service of process if permitted
- where a sua sponte dismissal is contemplated by a district court, that court must first give \both notice of the court's intention and an opportunity to respond\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.