Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/30/1992

Sohaey v. Van Cura

Citations

  • 607 N.E.2d 253
  • 240 Ill. App. 3d 266
  • 180 Ill. Dec. 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[statements relative to future or contingent events, expectations, or probabilities are generally regarded as mere expressions of opinion or conjectures,” which will not support an ICFA action
  • finding no violation of ICFA where plaintiffs failed to show that defendant was aware of the falseness of his representations at the time they were made
  • error to bar expert who would have testified with respect to the standard of care for real estate brokers in negligence action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unverzagt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sohaey v. Van Cura

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.