Ruane v. Amore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that orders denying plaintiffs’ motions to reopen discovery were a step in the procedural progression that culminated in the granting of summary judgment
• “When the nature of the defect, and its existence, is beyond the jury’s common understanding and experience, expert testimony is necessary to establish a defect.”
• although not specifically mentioned in notice of appeal, record indicated that issue was raised below and was integral part of appeal; thus, it was not waived
• although not specifically mentioned in notice of appeal, record indicated that issue was raised below and was integral part of appeal; thus, it was not waived
• “The decision as to whether to reopen discovery rests in the sound discretion of the circuit court[,] and this court will not disturb such rulings on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion.”
• concealment must be “intended to induce false belief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).