Todd W. Musburger, Ltd. v. Meier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that work done by a law firm’s non-attorney in-house consultant was recoverable
• no abuse of discretion in denying leave to file affirmative defense where leave was sought the day before trial
• court properly barred expert testimony that purported to offer legal conclusions and interpret the parties’ agreement
• “As the trial court recognized, plaintiff law firm could only pursue an action for quantum meruit (and could not pursue a cause of action for breach of contract) because it was representing defendant on a contingent basis and was discharged in the midst of that representation.”
• involving leave to file amended affirmative defenses
• involving leave to file amended affirmative defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).