Mielke v. Condell Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to a prior version of the rule wherein the standard referred to was contained in a different paragraph
• attorney uses exhibits to cross-examine expert witnesses and relies on the exhibits in her closing argument
• unless reference is made to a portion of the record that supports reversal, argument will not be considered
• “In a complex situation such as is present here, involving the pharmacological effects of a drug regimen, a layperson cannot be expected to determine without the aid of expert testimony what standard should be used to judge -8- No. 1-23-0133 the hospital’s conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).