Petri v. Gatlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “specific facts demonstrating the plaintiff[’s] compliance with each and every provision of [the] contract[] is simply not necessary at this stage of the proceedings”
• plaintiff was not required to specifically allege their own performance when the complaint “unquestionably” provided adequate notice of the nature of the breach of contract action
• “The person to whom authority is delegated may enjoy a considerable amount of discretion in carrying out those tasks, but the ultimate decisionmaking power resides with the delegator.”
• mere allegations that defendant entered into contracts that it had no intention of fulfilling renders ICFA claim suspect because ICFA claim must state more than action for common law breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).