· 10/18/1985
Munjal v. Baird & Warner, Inc.
Citations
- 485 N.E.2d 855
- 138 Ill. App. 3d 172
- 92 Ill. Dec. 809
- 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- implying that clear and convincing evidence required to establish fraud under the Illinois consumer fraud act
- implying that clear and convincing evidence required to establish fraud under the Illinois consumer fraud act
- plaintiff paid more than the actual value of the real estate misrepresented to have no defects
- misrepresentation was an attempt to induce the purchaser to buy the house for a value that did not reflect the existence of the defect
- misrepresentation was an attempt to induce the purchaser to buy the house for a value that did not reflect the existence of the defect
- misrepresentation was an attempt to induce the purchaser to buy the house for a value that did not reflect the existence of the defect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hope, Nash, Strouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.