Skip to main content
· 10/18/1985

Munjal v. Baird & Warner, Inc.

Citations

  • 485 N.E.2d 855
  • 138 Ill. App. 3d 172
  • 92 Ill. Dec. 809
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implying that clear and convincing evidence required to establish fraud under the Illinois consumer fraud act
  • implying that clear and convincing evidence required to establish fraud under the Illinois consumer fraud act
  • plaintiff paid more than the actual value of the real estate misrepresented to have no defects
  • misrepresentation was an attempt to induce the purchaser to buy the house for a value that did not reflect the existence of the defect
  • misrepresentation was an attempt to induce the purchaser to buy the house for a value that did not reflect the existence of the defect
  • misrepresentation was an attempt to induce the purchaser to buy the house for a value that did not reflect the existence of the defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hope, Nash, Strouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.