Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the determination of whether there is a motivation to combine is \appropriate for resolution on summary judgment.\
• explaining that “the sources of information for a properly flexible obviousness inquiry include… ‘any need or problem known in the field of endeavor at the time of invention and addressed by the patent’”
• “[EJvidence of secondary considerations does not always overcome a strong prima facie showing of obviousness.”
• common sense to repeat e-mail distribu- tion steps where there existed a goal of reaching a certain number of people
• quot- ing Centricut, LLC v. Esab Grp., Inc., 390 F.3d 1361, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2004)
• no expert required where ordinary skill in the art “required only a high school education and limited marketing and computer experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).