United States v. Great American Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the pattern of agents exceeding their authority with no objection from [the company] would lead a reasonable person in the government’s position to believe that such acts were authorized”
• holding that arguments not appropriately developed in briefing are deemed waived
• stating that ‘'[i]t is well established that arguments that are not appropriately developed in a party’s briefing may be deemed waived.”
• holding, in an APA case, that “the trial court correctly concluded that [the plaintiff] did not present sufficient evidence of prejudice to create a triable issue of fact regarding prejudice from the government’s procedural error”
• requiring the surety to show the Government’s actions “materially modified the contract … by substantially increasing its risk”
• extending 28 U.S.C. § 1961 to this Court even though it is expressly applicable to only district courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).