Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a foreign company cannot avoid liability for a sale by delivering the product outside the U.S. to a U.S. customer for importation
• holding that an infringing sale may occur in more than one location as a sale has both a physical and a con- ceptual dimension to it
• holding products shipped f.o.b., where legal title transferred in Canada, were still sold “within the United States” because that is where buyers were located
• holding the domestic location of an act of infringement is “an element of the claim which must be proven before relief can be granted”
• endorsing principle that \courts have generally held that the Copyright Act only does not reach activities ‘that take place entirely abroad’ \ (quoting Subafilms, 24 F.3d at 1098)
• discussing the facts relevant to determining the place of sale of a trademark- infringing product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).