Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 3/24/2010

Smith v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

  • 602 F.3d 320
  • 602 F. Supp. 3d 320
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6190
  • 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1422
  • 2010 WL 1052837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an employee need not concede that an employer’s proffered reason is legitimate to proceed under the mixed-motive framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Jolly, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.