Fifth Circuit· 3/24/2010
Smith v. Xerox Corp.
Citations
- 602 F.3d 320
- 602 F. Supp. 3d 320
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6190
- 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1422
- 2010 WL 1052837
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an employee need not concede that an employer’s proffered reason is legitimate to proceed under the mixed-motive framework
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Jolly, Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court· 2013-06-24· cited 3,582×
- Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 357×
- Greene v. DoruffSeventh Circuit· 2011-10-11· cited 187×
- Carleen Black v. Pan American LaboratoriesFifth Circuit· 2011-07-11· cited 77×
- Palmquist v. ShinsekiFirst Circuit· 2012-08-02· cited 47×
- Delise Adams v. Memorial HermannFifth Circuit· 2020-08-31· cited 40×
- Schroeder v. Greater New Orleans Federal Credit UnionFifth Circuit· 2011-12-19· cited 32×
- Rapold v. Baxter International Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2013-01-30· cited 25×
- Garner v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co.S.D. Texas· 2011-11-29· cited 22×
- Maples v. University of Texas Medical BranchS.D. Texas· 2012-09-28· cited 17×
- Agoh v. Hyatt Corp.S.D. Texas· 2014-01-13· cited 17×
- Bennett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictN.D. Texas· 2013-03-29· cited 16×
- Everett v. Central Mississippi, Inc. Head Start ProgramFifth Circuit· 2011-10-05· cited 13×
- Nassar v. University of Texas South-Western Medical CenterFifth Circuit· 2012-03-08· cited 12×
- RBIII, L.P. v. City of San AntonioFifth Circuit· 2013-04-23· cited 11×
- Corley v. State Ex Rel. Division of Administration, Office of Risk ManagementM.D. Louisiana· 2011-09-13· cited 11×
- Brandon v. Sage Corp.W.D. Texas· 2014-11-19· cited 11×
- Richardson v. Prairie Opportunity, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2012-04-25· cited 9×
- Matthews v. City of West PointN.D. Mississippi· 2012-03-23· cited 9×
- Ramos v. Molina Healthcare, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2013-08-08· cited 9×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 3,836×
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 2,790×
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court· 1983-04-04· cited 2,660×
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court· 2003-06-09· cited 1,575×
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court· 1999-06-22· cited 1,125×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-06-15· cited 978×
- McCoy v. City of ShreveportFifth Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 844×
- Rachid v. Jack In The Box IncFifth Circuit· 2004-06-25· cited 564×
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1960-11-07· cited 323×
- KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 281×
- Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & CasinoNinth Circuit· 2002-08-02· cited 238×
- Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-05· cited 199×
- Fairley v. AndrewsSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-20· cited 191×
- Pamela Richardson v. Monitronics International, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2005-12-21· cited 175×
- Zatarains, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Oak Grove Smokehouse, Inc. And Visko's Fish Fry, Inc., Cross-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1983-02-25· cited 172×
- Salome Fierros v. Texas Department of HealthFifth Circuit· 2001-11-21· cited 164×
- Johnson v. Sawyer,et alFifth Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 155×
- Serwatka v. Rockwell Automation, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2010-01-15· cited 146×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.