Palmquist v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the ADA contains a but-for causation standard for retaliation and extending same standard to related provisions of Rehabilitation Act of 1973
• “That Congress added 'motivating factor’ language only to Title VII strongly suggests that such language should not be engrafted by judicial fiat onto other laws that Congress amended at the same time,” (citing Gross, 557 U.S. at 174, 129 S.Ct. 2343)
• adopting but-for causation for Rehabilitation Act claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).