Greene v. Doruff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the timing of a “conduct report, together with the rather threadbare nature of the report, was sufficient ... to create a triable issue.”
• stating that timing of a conduct report plus the threadbare nature of the report were sufficient to create a triable issue as to whether the report was issued in retaliation
• stating that timing of a conduct report plus the threadbare nature of the report were sufficient to create a triable issue as to whether the report was issued in retaliation
• noting that no First Amendment violation occurs if, regardless of the retaliatory motive, the defendants would have punished a prisoner for violating legitimate prison rules
• explaining that if the plaintiff would have suffered the identical harm, then “the defendant’s improper motive would have done no work, had no effect, left the world unchanged”
• applying Mt. 6 This standard varies from circuit to circuit, Watson v. Rozum, 834 F.3d 417, 425 (3d Cir. 2016) (collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).